Talk:2013 Football League Championship play-off final

Latest comment: 4 years ago by MWright96 in topic GA Review
Good article2013 Football League Championship play-off final has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
May 9, 2020Good article nomineeListed
May 23, 2021Good topic candidatePromoted
January 22, 2024Good topic removal candidateDemoted
Current status: Good article
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 2013 Football League Championship play-off Final. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:09, 20 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

GA Review

edit
This review is transcluded from Talk:2013 Football League Championship play-off Final/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: MWright96 (talk · contribs) 10:11, 9 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Will be reviewing this article as part of the GAN Backlog Drive of April to May 2020. MWright96 (talk)

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  

Lead

edit

Route to the final

edit

Background

edit

First half

edit

Second half

edit

Extra time

edit

References

edit

Will put the review on hold to allow the nominator to respond/query the points raised above. MWright96 (talk) 14:17, 9 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

MWright96 I think I've covered all of the above, let me know what you think. Cheers for the review. The Rambling Man (Stay indoors, stay safe!!!!) 15:47, 9 May 2020 (UTC)Reply
@The Rambling Man: Now promoting to GA class. MWright96 (talk) 17:44, 9 May 2020 (UTC)Reply