Talk:2013–14 York City F.C. season/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: NickGibson3900 (Talk - Cont.)

I will review shortly

Criteria Number	Criteria	Yes/No	Comment/s
1 a)	The prose is clear and concise, it respects copyright laws, and the spelling and grammar are correct		I fixed a few minor problems
1 b)	It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation
2 a)	It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline
2 b)	It provides in-line citations from reliable sources for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines
2 c)	It contains no original research
3 a)	It addresses the main aspects of the topic
3 b)	It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail
4	It represents viewpoints fairly and without bias, giving due weight to each
5	It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute
6 a)	Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content
6 b)	Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions
Overall	Overall Yes/No

I am passing this article. Well done.

Suggestions for future improvements:

1. Do you have a picture of the logo. Would be good if you could although it isn't essential.

   I'm afraid the logo can only be used at York City F.C. as it is non-free. And thanks for reviewing the article. Mattythewhite (talk) 21:26, 20 July 2014 (UTC)