Talk:2013–14 Bundesliga

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Untitled

edit

Nuremberg and Stuttgart are now mathematically safe as of today's results (May 4, 2013).

Bundesliga

edit

I have now corrected the team names to the exact replicas found in the previous season's Bundesliga article. There is no further need for change. Italia2006 (talk) 21:06, 3 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

Not entirely. I shouldn't be throwing out bad edits with good ones though. Sorry for that. TSG 1899 Hoffenheim is not to be piped to 1899 Hoffenheim and 1. FSV Mainz 05 isn't to be piped to Mainz 05, which you corrected yourself. It's correct now. Thanks. Walter Görlitz (talk) 21:31, 3 October 2013 (UTC)Reply
Although I'm not sure why TSG (Turn- und Sportgemeinschaft ) is permitted to be displayed when FC (Fußball-Club) isn't. Meh. It wasn't done correctly above. I fixed that. Walter Görlitz (talk) 21:36, 3 October 2013 (UTC)Reply
Perhaps I'm mistaken since since the tables don't display the TSG portion. Walter Görlitz (talk) 04:03, 5 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

someone should update the goal scorer statistics

edit

per the latest statistics http://www.bundesliga.de/de/liga/torjaeger/ --178.235.183.165 (talk) 20:32, 1 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on 2013–14 Bundesliga. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

 Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:05, 20 June 2017 (UTC)Reply