This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject U.S. Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.U.S. CongressWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. CongressTemplate:WikiProject U.S. CongressU.S. Congress articles
Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
So there's this poll from a couple of weeks ago concerning the HI-02 Democratic primary. I'd put it in the article if it weren't for the fact that, as David Nir noted, the poll's described as being "statewide", which would mean about half of its respondents (namely those who live in HI-01) aren't eligible to vote in the HI-02 primary. On the one hand it's pretty obviously useless; but on the other it seems sort of like original research to leave it out for that reason. Any thoughts? – hysteria18 (talk) 13:14, 27 February 2012 (UTC)Reply
.svg)
