Talk:2012 Pune bombings
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
Untitled
editCan we please change the map of India in this article to include J&K in India as it is in all the India related wiki's?
Number of Bombs exploded
editLeave the number of bombs which exploded to five (5) for now. Once the entire investigation takes place we will update the official figure from the government. Number of sources reporting 5 bombs and the ones reporting 4 will be updated below by me Rishabh Tatiraju (talk) 17:14, 1 August 2012 (UTC)
- Looks like the news reports are arriving at a consensus now...4 blasts NDTV, Zee News, IBN, HindustanTimes. Veryhuman (talk) 18:19, 1 August 2012 (UTC)
- Right, let us wait for a day or so still. Rishabh Tatiraju (talk) 18:10, 1 August 2012 (UTC)
Map
editI have made a map (below) using the basic OpenStreetMap.org as background. It will be updated as more info comes.
Rishabh Tatiraju (talk) 17:56, 1 August 2012 (UTC)
- Can you point out what number corresponds to which target? Veryhuman (talk) 18:19, 1 August 2012 (UTC)
- Done in the file description as well as in the article page. Rishabh Tatiraju (talk) 04:19, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
- Can you point out what number corresponds to which target? Veryhuman (talk) 18:19, 1 August 2012 (UTC)
Connection with Anna Hazare's agitation on Jantar mantar
editThe fact added on the article "These low intensity bombs were also seen as a tactic of the central government to divert the attention of national media and public from Anna Hazare's agitation on Jantar mantar" has no valid reference. I browsed and found that these are actually comments made by users reading the articles. See here and here. I propose this sentence to be removed as soon as possible, if no citation added in the next few hours. The article has been getting many page hits and keeping any invalid information won't be good. BPositive (talk) 04:27, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
- Some overenthusiastic Anna supporter keeps on reverting back to that line. Unless there are atleast two reliable sources (WP:RS) substantiating this conspiracy theory, we should keep deleting that line. We have already given enough time for adding RS and they havent been added so far. Anna Hazare's anti-corruption stance is noble, but this is an encyclopedia - no place for ideology propaganda. Veryhuman (talk) 13:58, 2 August 2012 (UTC)