Talk:2012 Harvard cheating scandal

Latest comment: 8 years ago by Cyberbot II in topic External links modified

Organization, Names, and Verdict

edit

If available there should be more information on how the cheating was organized, after all, 125 students are implicated in the scandal of which the exact number is also not mentioned in the article. None of the students names are listed in the article, but are listed in media sources and are surley notable enough in the most signifigant academic dishonesty scandal in recent history. Also there is no section on the verdict and although the verdict has not occured there should still be a section on it discussing predictions, date, and that it has not happened. As can be imagined more can be added after the verdict. there should be seperate sections on Organization, Names, and Verdict.--150.216.226.109 (talk) 12:46, 18 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

You added innuendo and WP:EXCEPTIONAL claims like "Possibly over half (70%) of the student body" without any sources. CallawayRox (talk) 19:37, 18 September 2012 (UTC)Reply
What was his innuendo?--2012Hcs (talk) 01:28, 19 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Tenses in the lead

edit

Should the language in the lead be present tense instead of past, as the investigation is ongoing? It's currently past tense save one sentence I added that refers to the ongoing nature of the scandal. GoodnightmushTalk 21:07, 18 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 3 external links on 2012 Harvard cheating scandal. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

 Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 11:38, 26 February 2016 (UTC)Reply