Talk:2011 Qantas industrial disputes

Images

I think this article needs an image of the workers striking, as the current images are a little ambiguous. Also, the current plane images should be moved to the section about the grounding of the airline in this article, as they aren't really suitable for the introduction section of this article. Bodman456 (talk) 03:36, 30 October 2011 (UTC)

1 image of a Qantas plane was adequate as it provided readers with some knowledge of the Qantas brand but 2 is unnecessary. For most readers the difference between a domestic and international plane is minute, meaningless and most of all, unimportant. A brief outline of the two Qantas 'departments' suspending is substantial enough. YuMaNuMa (talk) 03:49, 30 October 2011 (UTC)

I think the image should show the empty Qantas counters in the terminal or the aircrafts ground.--Coekon (talk) 08:31, 30 October 2011 (UTC)

In addition to the above, I think there should be an image showing passenger travel disruption caused by the dispute, if at all possible. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.32.129.220 (talk) 00:08, 31 October 2011 (UTC)

Synthesis and verification of citations

A number of claims in the article are not found in the articles cited, at all. In addition there is systematic synthesis amounting to original research. Claims must explicitly be found in the citation, not a result of interpretation of the citation combined with additional data. In addition, the structure of the article must not be synthetic. Mention of previous industrial action must be established by a source explicitly connecting past action to this industrial incident. Fifelfoo (talk) 09:39, 2 November 2011 (UTC)

Page move

Given that a lock-out has occurred, describing this as a "trade union dispute" when the Australian term of art and legal term is "industrial dispute" is extremely troubling and problematic. Fifelfoo (talk) 09:39, 2 November 2011 (UTC)

Neutrality of article disputed

The page has little information about the cost the Union strike action had on Qantas as a business and therefore can perhaps be seen as supporting the union movement's actions against Qantas. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jaw123 (talk • contribs) 02:18, 9 June 2012 (UTC)

Updates?

Should it be added what has happened in the dispute since the Fair Work order? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tomwood0 (talk • contribs) 16:22, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

Background to the pilots industrial action is lacking and is applicable to 2021

Just as a random example the AIPA President Barry M Jackson said much more than what he is quoted on here and it was related to much more especially on outsourcing and how safety was lowered within the Qantas Group hence applicable to 2021.2Safe (talk) 07:57, 9 May 2021 (UTC).2Safe (talk) 07:31, 9 May 2021 (UTC)