Talk:2010 United States Senate election in Washington
![]() | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This is a historical article, not a daily tally sheet. If someone drops out or loses, do not erase them; rather, refer to them as having run and lost, dropped out, etc. |
LVs vs. RVs
editPolls go by different voter models. This table doesn't differentiate. Is there any standard on how to handle this? --Muboshgu (talk) 01:07, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
- That's great question and I wish I had a great answer. My understanding is that RV vs. LV is simply one more facet of individual pollster methodology that is (should) be explained by the pollster on their link website. I would assert that to try to explain, in detail, the exact methodology of each poll here is unrealistic. TomPointTwo (talk) 09:41, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
- You can add a column for 'Likely voter' or 'Registered voter' if you like. Same with margin of error percentages. Flatterworld (talk) 19:15, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on United States Senate election in Washington, 2010. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20100821041354/http://vote.wa.gov:80/Elections/WEI/Results.aspx?RaceTypeCode=O&JurisdictionTypeID=1&ElectionID=36&ViewMode=Results to http://vote.wa.gov/Elections/WEI/Results.aspx?RaceTypeCode=O&JurisdictionTypeID=1&ElectionID=36&ViewMode=Results
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20101028234525/http://www.cqpolitics.com/wmspage.cfm?docID=ratings-senate to http://www.cqpolitics.com/wmspage.cfm?docID=ratings-senate
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:47, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
editThe following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 20:38, 22 April 2020 (UTC)