Talk:2010 Ladakh floods

A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on August 6, 2014 and August 6, 2020.

India: Jammu and Kashmir Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Jammu and Kashmir (assessed as Low-importance).

Ladakh

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ladakh, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ladakh on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LadakhWikipedia:WikiProject LadakhTemplate:WikiProject LadakhLadakh articles

Weather: Floods Low‑importance

	Weather portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Weather, which collaborates on weather and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details. Articles Requested Project Resources Become a Member Project Talk Assessment A-Class Alerts WeatherWikipedia:WikiProject WeatherTemplate:WikiProject WeatherWeather articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Floods task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Faulty refs edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The refs are faulty. The Peerzada ref does not point to much of the information purported to be contained by it. AshLin (talk) 14:06, 30 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Rename edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago3 comments1 person in discussion

These floods in fact affected much of the central Ladakh batholith, not just Leh. Rename as 2010 Ladakh floods? DanHobley (talk) 14:25, 2 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

For a peer reviewed reference, see, e.g., http://geology.geoscienceworld.org/content/early/2012/03/23/G32935.1.abstract (I'll add appropriate details at some point soon)DanHobley (talk) 02:45, 11 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

I went ahead and did it. Hope that's all OK. DanHobley (talk) 19:59, 18 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

Add topic