Talk:2010 Kaohsiung earthquake

Learn more about this page

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 2010 Kaohsiung earthquake article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Taiwan Mid‑importance

	Taiwan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Taiwan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Taiwan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TaiwanWikipedia:WikiProject TaiwanTemplate:WikiProject TaiwanTaiwan articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Earthquakes Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Earthquakes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of earthquakes, seismology, plate tectonics, and related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EarthquakesWikipedia:WikiProject EarthquakesTemplate:WikiProject EarthquakesWikiProject Earthquakes articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.

Wikipedians in Taiwan may be able to help!

The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Merge? edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago4 comments4 people in discussion

Since this is minor, why not merging it into 2010 earthquakes? --DAI (Δ) 10:58, 4 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Agree. 71.107.193.35 (talk) 20:04, 4 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Dissagree, earthquakes are events notable enough to have there own articles, if there reletivly large. This one is.--HighFlyingFish (talk) 18:19, 6 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Disagree too. 6.7, 96 injuries, located close to a large population centre, loss of power, structural damage, trains disrupted, a fire. Seems as large as you can get without anyone dying. --can dle •wicke 10:27, 8 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Earthquake scale edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The infobox has it as 6.4 on moment magnitude scale, but body has it as 6.4 on Richter magnitude scale. Which is it? dude1818 (talk) 21:11, 4 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 2010 Kaohsiung earthquakes. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100307230854/http://news.chinatimes.com/2007Cti/2007Cti-News/2007Cti-News-Content/0,4521,50104574+132010030401802,00.html to http://news.chinatimes.com/2007Cti/2007Cti-News/2007Cti-News-Content/0,4521,50104574

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:47, 21 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Add topic