This article is within the scope of WikiProject Israel, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Israel on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IsraelWikipedia:WikiProject IsraelTemplate:WikiProject IsraelIsrael-related articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica articles
The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to post-1978 Iranian politics, which has been designated as a contentious topic.
Latest comment: 15 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion
Considering the term air raid is more generally associated with strategic bombing, and that one target may have been sea based, I think the term "airstrike" would be more appropriate in the title. Joshdboz (talk) 20:00, 28 March 2009 (UTC)Reply
News sources don't call the event "2009 Sudan air raids". They use a variety of names. We should copy one of those names. Even more important an error is Wikipedia uses this made up title in the introductory sentence as if it were an established name. The Wikipedia manual of style doesn't require its use like this. We shouldn't because it makes Wikipedia look like a joke. User F203 (talk) 16:36, 2 April 2009 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
This might be a bit pedantic, but the map currently used in the article ([1]) is wrong. It depicts Sudan as not including South Sudan, but at the time of these events in 2009, it did. Robofish (talk) 11:52, 24 August 2011 (UTC)Reply