Talk:2009 Nobel Prize
Latest comment: 14 years ago by Sephiroth BCR in topic Annual articles a good idea?
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Annual articles a good idea?
editI'm not entirely sure that it is relevant to have annual articles, in addition to the articles on the respective prizes and the various overview articles. Any thoughts? Tomas e (talk) 15:03, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
- I concur. I initially tagged this page for a CSD A11 as it pretty much recreates the content available on List of Nobel Laureates but I'd like other opinions.--Falcon8765 (talk) 23:09, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
- Well, the only thing that I see that this type of article (or rather, 100+ articles in a series of this type) could really add, would be specific information on that year's award ceremonies. However, I see no such information currently. I suggest to give the discussion a week or so, and if no substantial support emerges in that time, redirect it to the main Nobel Prize article rather than deleting it via an "admin route". Tomas e (talk) 09:32, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
- There is also a discussion of this article here: [1]
- Well, the only thing that I see that this type of article (or rather, 100+ articles in a series of this type) could really add, would be specific information on that year's award ceremonies. However, I see no such information currently. I suggest to give the discussion a week or so, and if no substantial support emerges in that time, redirect it to the main Nobel Prize article rather than deleting it via an "admin route". Tomas e (talk) 09:32, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
There is the reason to why it was created. --Esuzu 18:05, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
I redirected it; there's no real point to having annual articles when List of Nobel laureates exists. — sephiroth bcr (converse) 07:50, 28 January 2010 (UTC)