Talk:2009–10 Eredivisie

Falkenburg or Zomer

There is some uncertainty as to who scored the 2-0 in today's match between Sparta and NEC. The Eredivisie initially registered it as an own goal by NEC player Ramon Zomer, but has now awarded the goal to Sparta player Erik Falkenburg. 94.212.31.237 (talk) 15:46, 1 November 2009 (UTC)

I don't want to sound harsh, but where is the point in keeping all of the goalscorers when the top scorers would do as well? In fact, the current format (not only here, but also in a few other articles) is a nice demonstration of WP:NOT#STATS. There would be no need to sort out such details in 99 out of 100 cases if the goalscorers are kept to the project-standard Top10 plus those who are level with the tenth-best scorer. --Soccer-holic^{I hear voices in my head...} 16:11, 1 November 2009 (UTC)

I don't really care either way, to be very honest with you. If there's a consensus to keep it, that's fine with me, if there's a consensus to remove it, that's fine with me as well. I only care about keeping it correct and up to date as long as it's there. Feel free to raise this issue at WT:FOOTY. 94.212.31.237 (talk) 16:15, 1 November 2009 (UTC)

We already got a discussion going on that, to be found at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football/Season article task force#Statistics in general, goalscoring tables in particular; thus my concerns. --Soccer-holic^{I hear voices in my head...} 16:37, 1 November 2009 (UTC)

All I see (with all due respect to everyone's efforts and intentions) is a three month old attempt at getting a discussion going. I strongly support discussing this and achieving a consensus, and I am more than happy to follow whatever the outcome of that discussion may be, but I think the chances of a thorough discussion, and therefore the chances of a widely shared consensus, are much bigger at WT:FOOTY. 94.212.31.237 (talk) 16:49, 1 November 2009 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on 2009–10 Eredivisie. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120301105542/http://uk.soccerway.com/news/2010/March/13/az-fire-six-past-rkc-waalwijk/ to http://uk.soccerway.com/news/2010/March/13/az-fire-six-past-rkc-waalwijk/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071218125534/http://www.eredivisie.nl/subpage.aspx?l1=1667&l2=1676&action=rankings&nonzeros=8 to http://www.eredivisie.nl/subpage.aspx?l1=1667&l2=1676&action=rankings&nonzeros=8

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:08, 18 June 2017 (UTC)