Talk:2008 United States presidential election in Alaska

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Legislative districts results edit

I don't know if anybody's interested, but CQ has a table of Alaska results by districts of the Alaska House of Representatives. I'm not sure how useful it is (I doubt the average person knows which district corresponds to which part of the state), but it could have some informational value. – Hysteria18 (Talk • Contributions) 21:32, 6 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

  • I don't think it's a bad idea. It would actually be pretty interesting. Just make sure to put in who represents the district.--Jerzeykydd (talk) 02:07, 8 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

No Palin Impact? edit

Surely it's a bit wrong to assume putting Palin on the ticket had no impact whatsoever, especially as there is evidence that McCain was behind in Alaska before he picked Palin. The fact that McCain was behind in Alaska then took a 20 point lead would certainly hint at a Palin effect. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.145.37.117 (talk) 23:54, 27 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Borough Colors edit

From what I see and understand, the map of Alaska's boroughs show that Obama won the majority of votes in some and McCain did in the others. That's not correct, McCain won all the boroughs.[1][2]. Am I reading the map correctly? If I am, in needs to be changed but I don't know how to do that. ─ Matthewi (Talk) • 12:28, 6 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Having done a lot of work with the Alaska election results provided by the Division of Elections, I can attest that this map and the one from 2012 can not possibly be accurate. Reporting of in precinct results is done on a precinct by precinct basis, and I have not yet found a precinct that straddles two boroughs or census areas, but absentee, question or challenged, and early voting are aggregated over the 40 house districts of Alaska's lower legislative chamber. It looks very much like the proffered map is the result of reporting just the individual precinct totals. Any attempt to allocate these votes among the larger census areas which encompass multiple census areas is bound to be guesswork, and they comprise something close 30% of all ballots cast. Since early voting and questioned ballots skew Democratic, some places with high amounts of early voting may be painted the wrong color. More to the point, Petersburg Borough's formation was a ballot issue in 2012, so if its results are listed in this map, it's an anachronism.--2601:B:8000:67E:949E:19BA:FAAE:C8EB (talk) 07:05, 26 May 2014 (UTC) John FoelsterReply
Unlike in many other states where state and federal elections are oftentimes conducted at the county level nonetheless, Alaska has a unified, state-run bureaucracy for these elections. It could very well be that the map creators simply didn't provide a borough-by-borough breakdown because the Alaska Division of Elections doesn't tabulate its results in that fashion. For example, here is the precinct-by-precinct breakdown for the communities of the Wade Hampton Census Area:
Community McCain votes Obama votes
Alakanuk 57 79
Chevak 53 121
Emmonak 86 124
Hooper Bay 87 127
Kotlik 40 106
Marshall 35 53
Mountain Village 138 85
Nunam Iqua 11 20
Pilot Station 92 73
Pitkas Point 16 8
Russian Mission 33 60
St. Mary's 51 101
Scammon Bay 39 59
TOTAL 738 1,016

This is a borough equivalent in which Obama outpolled McCain by a significant margin. RadioKAOS  – Talk to me, Billy 01:04, 10 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

I will however note that although we have no idea how the absentee, early and question voters in Wade Hampton voted, it is unlikely that they were (there are unlikely to have been any early ballots in Wade Hampton though), in aggregate, enough to overcome Obama's margin in this case and are actually more likely to have added to it.--2601:B:8000:67E:949E:19BA:FAAE:C8EB (talk) 07:05, 26 May 2014 (UTC) John FoelsterReply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on United States presidential election in Alaska, 2008. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:28, 21 July 2016 (UTC)Reply