Talk:2008 United States Senate election in Oregon

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Approval Rating edit

I think the page looks better witht he approval ratings of Smith. I took the idea off the West Virginia 2006, 2008 Senate Elections. In time, I intend to make each 2008 page look like this, approval wise. Politics rule 21:45, 24 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

P.S Let me know what you think on my talk!

Oregon's primary edit

Where did the election tally come from? Every single media in Oregon had Merkeley beating Novick by 47% to 41%, with a 17,000 vote margin. —Micahbrwn (talk) 01:05, 22 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

I added the citation. Feel free to update, it's even closer now... --Esprqii (talk) 02:04, 22 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Polling edit

Why are we keeping the polls for Novick against Smith with Fronmeyer. These candiates have dropped out, and it's a waste of space. America69 (talk) 17:56, 2 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

By that argument why keep any polls more than a couple months old when there is new polling? I suggest old polling be kept for now even if irrelevant to predicting the current race because it shows what the situation was at that point in time.Bdell555 (talk) 06:50, 21 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on United States Senate election in Oregon, 2008. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

 Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 08:29, 22 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 9 external links on United States Senate election in Oregon, 2008. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

 Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:20, 21 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on United States Senate election in Oregon, 2008. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:49, 20 September 2017 (UTC)Reply