Talk:2008 Bolivian vote of confidence referendum

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Threshold edit

I'm confused about the requirement for the recall to succeed. This link - [1] says that to succeed the yes to recall votes have to be more than 53.74% and more than 1,544,374 (the figures for the previous election) whereas the article at the moment refers only to the percentage. Coudl anyone in the know clarify? Thanks AndrewRT(Talk) 21:11, 10 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

BBC and the loser governors edit

BBC news website [2] says that two of the defeated governors are pro-Morales, as this Wikipedia article says that two of them were oppositionists. It seems clear that Cochabamba's, La Paz's and Oruro's governors lost and that Oruro's governor is socialist and that Cochabamba's is autonomist but how is it with the governor of La Paz? --80.223.146.227 (talk) 15:20, 11 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

La Paz governor is PODEMOS (opposition) according to this: [3]. Final results show only losses are La Paz and Cochabamba (both opposition) BBC ref was only draft results. AndrewRT(Talk) 22:54, 18 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Bolivian vote of confidence referendum, 2008. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:48, 5 November 2016 (UTC)Reply