Talk:2008–09 Chelsea F.C. season

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Matches in key events edit

I dont think every single match should be included in the Key dates section.Azlan2k7 (talk) 11:25, 27 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Confusing Stats edit

Whoever put all the stats and results after the top scorers table has made it very confusing. The layout that was done before that was much easier to read and had more off the stuff people want to know.Chelseafcthebest (talk) 02:18, 17 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Shevchenko edit

Should we put this in as {Key Dates} and {Transfers Out}? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 125.238.9.53 (talk) 07:07, 24 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Starting formations edit

4-3-3 was not the STARTING formation used in the first Premier League game against Portsmouth. I'm guessing that the official Chelsea website is reasonably authoritative on this issue; therefore, this article (http://www.chelseafc.com/page/LatestNews/0,,10268~1368614,00.html) should be sufficient. I have seen absolutely no media after the game stating that Chelsea started the game in 4-3-3. It is true that in the second half, 4-3-3 was used after Michael Ballack's injury, but it has not yet been used as a starting formation, or at least recognised as such, in a competitive fixture this season. Thecomaboy (talk) 09:50, 31 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Fixtures edit

I've been posting the next Premier League match under the last match the whole season. I noticed someone removed the latest one and said that such information is copyrighted. Can I still do the same for CL, Carling Cup and FA Cup or are they copyrighted material also? Thank you.

Substitute appearances edit

The 'Appearances and goals' table is becoming increasingly difficult to maintain as the number of games accumulates, as it is difficult to tell who has started a game and who came off the bench. This also affects the Starting 11 section.

Is there a way of listing it so that we may see in the Appearances and goals table separate starting and substitute appearances for each player? For example e.g. Frank Lampard's Premier League appearances are currently 8+0 (8 starts, none from the bench). This would certainly make both sections easier to maintain. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Thecomaboy (talkcontribs) 10:27, 19 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Changing the matches layout edit

I noticed a user changed the matches sections to an alternating grey and white every other match. I reverted to the regular format and I created a discussion on the topic. I like the old white with line dividers, but I see other users want to change to grey and white. If you like one style over the other please voice your opinion here and we will make the changes or keep it the same according to the votes. Place your screen name under which style you like better. Yunggunn2k3 (talk) 00:42, 9 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

Regular White with dividers edit

  • Yunggunn2k3

Alternating Grey and White edit

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on 2008–09 Chelsea F.C. season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:14, 19 September 2016 (UTC)Reply