Talk:2008–09 Atlantic Coast Conference men's basketball season/GA1

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

GA review (see here for criteria)

There's so much to be done in this page in order to meet the criteria.

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS):  
    The WP:LEAD is basically non-existent. You should summarize the whole article in the lead section.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
    Each section needs to have at least one in-line citation to verify the information. Without inline citations, the information can be considered original research.
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
    The latter sections go into unnecessary details about this topic.
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
    Since most of the info is uncited, it's hard to grade neutrality
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:  
    This is a recent topic and can still significantly change .
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
    There are no images other than the logo.
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  
    Needs considerable work

--Crzycheetah 06:40, 24 June 2009 (UTC)Reply