Talk:2007 Cricket World Cup statistics

Latest comment: 3 years ago by RMCD bot in topic Move discussion in progress
Featured list2007 Cricket World Cup statistics is a featured list, which means it has been identified as one of the best lists produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
June 21, 2007Featured list candidatePromoted

Best Bowling in an innings edit

I've changed the best bowling in an innings table to be sorted by wickets then economy rate - seems much more sensible and logical than by wickets then runs scored off them. Can't see there being any problem with this but if there is please talk here rather than reverting it - thanks. AllynJ 02:39, 27 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Maybe it should be ecconomy first... is 5-45 (10) really better than 4-19 off 5? I don't think so. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Dacium (talkcontribs) 22:32, 30 April 2007 (UTC).Reply
I disagree there. Then you could argue (these are just examples) 2-1 (2) is better than 5-20 (5), or something. Wickets should definitely come first. But yeah, I spoke to the guy who reverted it: apparently it has always been done this way, not just at Cricinfo but everywhere else too, so I'm not gonna revert it. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by AllynJ (talkcontribs) 03:09, 1 May 2007 (UTC).Reply

Lead edit

The lead is currently pretty small, would someone be able to expand it please? It's the bit I find I'm worst at when it comes to articles. :p Thanks. AllynJ 11:30, 9 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thank you, Kalyan. :) AllynJ 18:48, 9 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 8 external links on 2007 Cricket World Cup statistics. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:47, 24 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 2007 Cricket World Cup statistics. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:54, 30 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Move discussion in progress edit

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Cricket World Cup which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 22:20, 16 February 2021 (UTC)Reply