Talk:2007 Atlantic hurricane season/June

  • 02L.BARRY - Best status: 45kt, 997mb.
Called 92L.INVEST 1800z 5/31/07.
T1.0 from SSD, Jun 1 TWO mentions subtropical possibility.
Called 02L.NONAME 1930z 6/1/07.
NHC upgraded to TS Barry 2007-06-01, 2100Z.
Right FNMOC says 02L.Barry -- WmE 19:34, 1 June 2007 (UTC)Reply
Of course, it doesn't say whether it's tropical or subtropical. Vortex message implies tropical. We'll have to wait an hour for that detail. For the article, the initial low formed two days ago in the Gulf of Honduras, and has been moving north since then. Thegreatdr 19:35, 1 June 2007 (UTC)Reply
I tend to belive that it is tropical as well. Recon found the strongest winds near the center and the temp. in the center is warmer than in its surroundings. -- WmE 19:39, 1 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

NHC updated, TS Barry. The advisory links are at present broken, but the path maps are available; was have a TS warning on the west coast of Florida. --Golbez 20:50, 1 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Just throwing it out there, I started a sandbox on the storm. Hurricanehink (talk) 02:30, 2 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Pretty good start, but more is needed for an article to be published on Barry. CrazyC83 03:32, 2 June 2007 (UTC)Reply
Hi. I've found information about Barry while extratropical. Barry is currently an extratropical remnant near the eastern US and Canada. Part of its extratropical remnants merged with another low near ontario. So, I picked a large city in southern ontario, which is toronto, and checked the last 24 hours' observations. It turns out, at the latest observation, it was 995.4 hPa in Toronto, which is currently being affected by the remnants of Barry. Link here: [1], try using internet archive website if you don't check today, although I'm not sure if you'll find an archive of it. Now, the article states that Barry's strongest was 997 hPa. Now, obviously, the observation I got in the link, indicates a lower pressure. However, are extratropical remnant readings included in an article like this? Should it be included in the article? You can also search for any specific city affected by this storm in Canada, then look for "last 24h". There you'll find, probably more observations. Some of them may be lower than the reading of pressure in the article. Do extratropical storms usually intensify? Should one of the readings be included in the article, or are the readings too unnoficial, too unclear which low the readings are part of (the Barry or the other low), or too local? Thanks. -- AstroHurricane001(T+C+U) 20:59, 4 June 2007 (UTC)Reply
Actually, the readings are fine, but the article only indicates what the minimum pressure is as a tropical cyclone. Extratropical readings aren't needed. Hurricanehink (talk) 21:11, 4 June 2007 (UTC)Reply
Besides that was not from Barry, but from another extratropical low that has been absorbing the remnants... CrazyC83 01:37, 6 June 2007 (UTC)Reply
  • 93L.INVEST
Best status from NRL: 25kts, 1009mb.
93L.INVEST appeared 2007-06-09 @ 2045z.
gone 2007-06-11 at 0100z.
  • 94L.INVEST
Best status from NRL: 25kts, 1006mb.
94L.INVEST appeared 2007-06-14, 0015z @ 18.8N 86.4W.
Gone 2007-06-17, 1715z, @ 28.5N 72.8W.
  • 95L.INVEST
Best status from NRL: 20kts, 1014mb.
95L.INVEST appeared 2007-06-29, 1245z @ 26.3N 80.7W,