Talk:2007 Atlantic hurricane season/GA1

GA Review

I will be reviewing this article for GA status, thanks!--Finalnight (talk) 14:43, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

Looks like Finalnight isn't going to do it, so...

Here goes... Plasticup ^T/C 16:55, 18 July 2008 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)

---

The article's biggest weakness is its prose. It needs a good firm review, especially the lead. That said, it easily passes GA.

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

   The lead needs be much smoother before FAC. e.g. starting a paragraph with a pronoun.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   Plasticup ^T/C 17:08, 18 July 2008 (UTC)