Talk:2006 Varanasi bombings

Latest comment: 8 years ago by Cyberbot II in topic External links modified

2006 Varanasi bombings removed from Wikipedia:Good articles edit

2006 Varanasi bombings (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) was formerly listed as a good article, but was removed from the listing because misses it some criteria, sorry: (1) not stable yet. It is current event. (2) Accuracy is also too eraly to decide. Please be patient. mikka (t) 06:19, 9 March 2006 (UTC)Reply


Let the = "Helpline Phone Numbers "be there as it is current news. - P R A D E E P Somani (talk)
Feel free to send me e-mail.

Contradiction edit

The first paragraph says that the first blast took place at 6:20 p.m at the crowded Sankat Mochan Hanuman Temple but the timeline at the bottom says that the first blast took place around 6:25 pm (IST) at the Sankat Mochan temple. When exactly did the blast took place? vedant (talkcontribs) 08:52, 8 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

The initial article says there were 2 blasts at the Railway station, one in the waiting room, and one on the Shivganga Express. I was a passenger on the Shivganga express and was on the platform at the time. We distinctly heard only one blast (I estimate that it was about 18:35), the train was moved further down the platform after about 30 mins, and later departed about 2 hours late. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 61.0.45.40 (talkcontribs) 12:34, 10 March 2006 (IST).

The article has been changed accordingly. vedant (talkcontribs) 06:53, 11 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

Accuracy edit

The link in note 3 goes to a BBC story which states that no one has claimed responsibility yet, although the article states that not only has Pakistan claimed responsibility but that India has declared war. This is entirely untrue and very blatant misinformation when compared with other sources. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 140.247.226.219 (talkcontribs) 21:32, 8 March 2006 (IST).

Misinformation edit

For some reason, this article cannot be edited, even though it is providing false information. Some agent must have rigged it somehow. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 140.247.226.219 (talkcontribs) 21:38, 8 March 2006 (IST).

I can edit it without any problem. It may be semi-protected, which prevents unregistered editors and editors with very new accounts from editing the page. However, I see that it is not protected and anyone can edit it. If you cannot, please report it on Wikipedia:Village pump (technical). vedant (talkcontribs) 06:53, 11 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

Reactions edit

Aren't there more world reactions we could list? I'm thinking about India's neighbors -- not just Pakistan, though that would be nice. Rachel 21:15, 9 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

Dead link edit

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 12:36, 14 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Dead link 2 edit

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 12:37, 14 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on 2006 Varanasi bombings. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

 Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 02:48, 15 January 2016 (UTC)Reply