Talk:2006 Bhiwandi lynching
![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 17 January 2018. The result of the discussion was keep. |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 2006 Bhiwandi lynching article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Contested deletion
editThis page should not be speedily deleted because... I had reverted the G5 once, taking the responsibility of the article per accordance with WP:BANREVERT, but my edit and category changes were reverted by the nominator. I am taking the responsibility of this article mostly because it is notable and meets WP:LASTING. --Raymond3023 (talk) 13:10, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
- Where is the "lasting"? I can't see it. Alas, if we have an article for every incident of communal violence that takes place in India, we'd have twice as many articles as the English Wikipedia currently holds. Perhaps we should, perhaps we should not, but the manner in which the legal system and media of India operates means that due process often takes five years or more and even the most up-market newspapers are akin to UK tabloids. It might be better just to have a list somewhere, since most of these things will never develop beyond stubs. - Sitush (talk) 15:02, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
- Since it received coverage even after 10 years of the incident, it meets WP:LASTING.[1] Raymond3023 (talk) 15:07, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
- That source appears to be dated 2006. Am I misreading the date? - Sitush (talk) 15:29, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
- Was attempting to provide this 2016[2] link. Raymond3023 (talk) 15:32, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
- Ok thanks. Anything else? One retrospective in a series that invites readers to suggest subjects to cover does not a summer make. - Sitush (talk) 15:38, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
- Like you have said "It might be better just to have a list somewhere, since most of these things will never develop beyond stubs", if there was a proposal that we should get rid of all these stubs and make a single page regarding the incidents that could meet WP:LASTING, it would be better, but right now there are too many articles that fail WP:LASTING still they have survived AFD. But given the current circumstances, this article would survive AFD. Though I can hope for a proposal that I mentioned, which would at least avoid creation of these stubs. Raymond3023 (talk) 15:41, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
- Ok thanks. Anything else? One retrospective in a series that invites readers to suggest subjects to cover does not a summer make. - Sitush (talk) 15:38, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
- Was attempting to provide this 2016[2] link. Raymond3023 (talk) 15:32, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
- That source appears to be dated 2006. Am I misreading the date? - Sitush (talk) 15:29, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
- Since it received coverage even after 10 years of the incident, it meets WP:LASTING.[1] Raymond3023 (talk) 15:07, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
Title
editThis article is biassed in many ways. I've already fixed a couple of misrepresentations of the sources but I actually think the title itself may be a problem, too. The so-called lynching occurred after some people had allegedly been shot by the police but that gets only a passing mention here and there is no context provided. The article actually appears to be something of a hit job aimed at Muslims. - Sitush (talk) 15:28, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
If this thing must survive then 2006 Bhiwandi violence would be a better title, and the article should be expanded to explain the background. - Sitush (talk) 15:36, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
- Agreed. Raymond3023 (talk) 15:41, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
- [3] gives good information on background. Raymond3023 (talk) 15:48, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
Sitush ,Raymond3023 Sitush you should have asked for references not wrongly raised questions POV pushing as it can given. Please see the full report http://rmponweb.org/upload/StudyReport/37420bhiwandi-riots-2006.pdf
Mr. Shakeel Raza during the 4th July, 2006 rally at Azad Maidan, in Mumbai, an offence came to be registered against him.
female constable Ms. Anita More was attacked and her uniform was torn apart by the female in the mob. One platoon of State Reserved Police Force intervened and rescued this female constable.
Since 1920 the site of the proposed police construction is standing in the name of Public Works Department. It has been exclusively used for the police purposes only.
Regular Civil Suit No. 298/06 On 4th July, Raza Academy had organized a huge rally at Azad Maidan, Mumbai in protest against the construction of police station. During the course of the speech, Mr. Shakeel Raza advocated the ‘Law of Shariyat’ , if the judiciary was not giving them a justice and the government duly got elected by them was not observing the rule of law
https://www.outlookindia.com/newswire/story/killers-of-bhiwandi-cops-would-not-be-spared-patil/397579 https://news.webindia123.com/news/Articles/India/20160909/2935656.html The police officers who were on duty at Bhiwandi police stations, Ramesh Jagtap and BS Gangurde had become martyrs thus. The case pertaining to this incident of Nizampura police station is yet to be decided in the courts.The murder case does not appear to have been decided.42.111.200.183 (talk) 00:40, 18 January 2018 (UTC)