Talk:2002 Scottish Challenge Cup final
Latest comment: 11 years ago by Cal Umbra in topic GA Review
![]() | 2002 Scottish Challenge Cup final has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: July 22, 2013. (Reviewed version). |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:2002 Scottish Challenge Cup Final/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: The Rambling Man (talk · contribs) 18:09, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
Comments
- In the lead you have some sentences/paragraphs referenced, some others not. Why? Ordinarily a lead shouldn't contain information that isn't expanded on in the main article (so in general a lead needs no refs at all).
- "second appearance in the final of the tournament since losing" do you mean second appearance or first appearance since losing? Or perhaps "second appearance ... having lost..."?
- " game and scored the first goal in the 33rd minute from John O'Neill" -> "game with John O'Neill scoring the first goal in the 33rd minute".
- Be aware of football jargon like "header"... we have a glossary of terms you could hashlink to specific sections as required.
- The lead you refer to it as using "elimination rounds" but the main article states (and links) it to be a "knock-out" tournament. Would try to be consistent here.
- "28 of the teams " avoid starting sentences with a number.
- "two received random byes into the second round" is this referenced anywhere?
- "produce a shock" is that a quote? To stay neutral I'd ask for a reference or attributable quotation here.
- "The stadium had played host to" -> "The stadium hosted..."
- "Dumfries based" needs a hyphen.
- References should use WP:DASH where appropriate and should avoid SHOUTING too.
- All references now contain "En dash" where appropriate and case has been lowered to sentence case where applicable. Cal Umbra 10:03, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
The Rambling Man (talk) 19:23, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
GA criteria
edit- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
All-round good stuff, just need to address the above comments, so I'll place the nomination on-hold for a week. The Rambling Man (talk) 19:23, 21 July 2013 (UTC)