Talk:2001 Nights

Notability

No review from Reliable source for both the manga & the OVA. Very problematic because it's a series licensed in 3 others languages from Japanese so reviews should be less scars —Preceding unsigned comment added by KrebMarkt (talk • contribs) 17:01, 19 August 2009

Scary thought... given its age, i'm not seeing much likelihood of new notability-granting reviews, either... which languages did you search in? 「ダイノガイ千？！」^{? · Talk⇒Dinoguy1000} 19:05, 19 August 2009 (UTC)

I'm pushed the torture up 12nd page of the Google results and nothing worth RS. I'm not voicing to have it deleted but rather raising the need attention flag. My feeling for this one is frustration :p

side-comment: The Category:Wikipedia requested photographs of anime and manga is full of stuffs that either need to be fixed, deleted or saved. --KrebMarkt 20:34, 19 August 2009 (UTC)

o_O 12 pages?! Did you only search in English, though?

And yeah, I think probably better than 60% of the stuff we have that's start- and stub-class either needs to be merged, can't establish notability, or is otherwise in dire need of work. 「ダイノガイ千？！」^{? · Talk⇒Dinoguy1000} 21:10, 19 August 2009 (UTC)

Must try with German & Italian only restriction but when you click too much on next results you start having those in other languages :p

Doubtful that someone will send it to Afd, the systemic bias tends to preserve stuff published in English. --KrebMarkt 20:57, 20 August 2009 (UTC)

All right, hopefully you'll turn up some stuff. In the meantime, maybe I should poke Collectonian to get the obligatory Manga: The Complete Guide review/information. And it's good, I think, that we're more hesitant to delete English-licensed stuff, regardless of the reasons - certainly, there are plenty of series that are non-notable in spite of being licensed in English, but there are also a good number that are barely notable, or that gain notability over time due to sudden attention being paid to them for some reason. 「ダイノガイ千？！」^{? · Talk⇒Dinoguy1000} 19:57, 21 August 2009 (UTC)

Got some reception info, as well as some other juicy tidbits - see User talk:Collectonian#2001 Nights review in Manga: The Complete Guide?. 「ダイノガイ千？！」^{? · Talk⇒Dinoguy1000} 16:35, 22 August 2009 (UTC)

Small thing

The romanisation of 物語 is "monogatari", not "monotogari" Atanovic (talk) 17:41, 22 November 2009 (UTC) ---- fixed it myself.. Atanovic (talk) 07:49, 29 August 2010 (UTC)

Reviews

• Anime News Network
  • Shelf Life
  • TO Review

—Farix (t | c) 11:20, 16 November 2012 (UTC)

• The Comics Journal. Opencooper (talk) 02:52, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

What does it cover

An early hard sci-fi work that doesn't state what it specifically covers? I see mention that it deals with suspended animation and interstellar travel, but what else? What makes these things worth knowing about is how different cultures reacted and dealt with new ideas. So what are the new ideas that it covers? It would go a long way towards it's notability if it was, say, a 1980's example of a space elevator. 199.241.14.253 (talk) 19:17, 4 April 2014 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 2001 Nights. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20161019221131/http://www.animax.co.jp/news/index.php?proc=detail&ID=2863 to http://www.animax.co.jp/news/index.php?proc=detail&ID=2863

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:11, 30 November 2016 (UTC)