Talk:2000 Japanese Grand Prix/GA1

Latest comment: 9 years ago by Nascarking in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Nascarking (talk · contribs) 18:23, 6 April 2015 (UTC)Reply


GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
    I went through the article and fixed some of the inconsistencies with the spelling out of numbers.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
    I found no problems here.
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
    No history of edit warring
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
    Not a deal-breaker, but I think the Michael Schumacher picture would best be placed in the post-race section.
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  
    The only thing I would change is the placement of the Schumi picture. Other than that, there are no problems with the article. I hereby give 2000 Japanese Grand Prix a pass. It's now a Good Article.--Nascar king 18:23, 6 April 2015 (UTC)Reply