Talk:2000 French Grand Prix/GA1

Latest comment: 9 years ago by Nascarking in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Nascarking (talk · contribs) 19:37, 6 April 2015 (UTC)Reply


GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
    Any number between one and twelve should be spelled out.
    Corrected the number issue Z105space (talk) 19:52, 6 April 2015 (UTC)Reply
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
    The pictures of Coulthard and Häkkinen could be moved down a little, but it's not a deal-breaker.
    Done Z105space (talk) 19:52, 6 April 2015 (UTC)Reply
  7. Overall:
    Pass:  
    Just fix the minor issue with the spelling out of numbers that should be and this will be a pass.--Nascar king 19:42, 6 April 2015 (UTC)Reply
    @Nascarking: All the issues have been fixed. Z105space (talk) 19:52, 6 April 2015 (UTC)Reply
    Then I hereby give 2000 French Grand Prix a pass. It's now a Good Article.--Nascar king 19:54, 6 April 2015 (UTC)Reply