This article was nominated for deletion on 1 February 2012 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.
A fact from 2000 Australia Beechcraft King Air crash appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 17 January 2011 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Disaster management on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Disaster managementWikipedia:WikiProject Disaster managementTemplate:WikiProject Disaster managementDisaster management articles
2000 Australia Beechcraft King Air crash is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Death on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath articles
Latest comment: 15 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
I think that this was a good idea to get the text away from the Lear Jet but the title is a bit tabloid like rather than encyclopedic. I suggest this should retain the title 2000 Australia Beechcraft King Air crash and that it be moved there. Ex nihil (talk) 12:46, 26 September 2008 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Any special reason for not naming the pilot? Valetude (talk) 05:26, 17 October 2015 (UTC)Reply
Yes. In the case of accidents, Wikipedia does not regard the identity of the victims as relevant to an encyclopaedia. (Wikipedia is not a newspaper). If the pilot or one of the passengers is notable for some other reason there might be adequate grounds for naming that person in the article about the accident. For example, in the article about the crash of VH-ANK, mention is made of Margaret McIntyre, one of the passengers and someone who has her own article on Wikipedia because she was the first woman elected to the Parliament of Tasmania. Dolphin(t) 11:51, 17 October 2015 (UTC)Reply
.svg){kind=logo}
