Talk:2. Bundesliga

Latest comment: 11 years ago by EdJohnston in topic Requested move (May 2013)
edit

The image Image:Duisburgzebra.png is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
  • That this article is linked to from the image description page.

The following images also have this problem:

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --06:37, 9 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

edit

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 04:46, 10 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 04:46, 10 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Confederation

edit

Why UEFA? The Confederation ist the DFL (Deutsche Fußball-Liga). — Preceding unsigned comment added by SamWinchester000 (talkcontribs) 15:48, 28 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Requested move

edit
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Not moved. to proposed title, without prejudice to other possible titles. (non-admin closure) Red Slash 19:10, 12 May 2013 (UTC)Reply



Disputed move.

2. Fußball-BundesligaBundesliga 2 – per WP:UE. The word 'fußball' isn't English and in any event is redundant; We don't usually employ ordinals, least of all when it follows a German convention 2 followed by a full stop. The official site (in English) seems to refer to it as Bundesliga2 or Bundesliga 2. See ongoing discussion at Talk:Fußball-Bundesliga#Requested_move  Ohconfucius ping / poke 16:08, 1 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Survey

edit
Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Discussion

edit
Any additional comments:

Moved to clearer title

edit

After an easy RMnac of the move request, I unilaterally and boldly moved this article to Second Bundesliga (German association football) pending future moves to better possible titles. In the meantime, this title is English and perfectly clear. Red Slash 19:13, 12 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

I'm a bit baffled here, wasn't every vote opposed to the move? And what about the Category:2. Fußball-Bundesliga and all the associated articles there that still have the 2. Fußball-Bundesliga in the tile? Calistemon (talk) 22:56, 12 May 2013 (UTC)Reply
While the NAC in itself is appropriate, I find it largely inappropriate that you've moved the article to a title that hasn't even been mentioned in the discussion, and I think the move should be reverted. If you have a personal opinion in a discussion, you shouldn't close the discussion, but rather propose your preferred title in the discussion. I've posted a post on WT:FOOTY, to have an uninvolved admin review both the NAC and the page-move. Mentoz86 (talk) 09:03, 13 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

I've undone the move. While I did comment above, I think it's plainly obvious that the novel way that this was closed isn't in line with the discussion. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 10:11, 13 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

One of the most bizarre NAC/page moves I've ever seen, good work undoing it. GiantSnowman 10:34, 13 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Worse still...

edit

Now Fußball-Bundesliga has been moved to Bundesliga (men), we have a totally corrupt bunch of article names. Perhaps another move request should be posted so we can try to make these names more consistent? The Rambling Man (talk) 18:13, 16 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Requested move (May 2013)

edit
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Moved to 2. Bundesliga to harmonize with the result of the 3. Liga move discussion, and after studying the comments here. It appears that some editors are unhappy with the rather Germanic and hard-to-type Fußball and that could be their main reason to want the name changed. Everyone wanted this league referred to as the '2nd league' in some fashion but there was less unanimity in how to specify this. EdJohnston (talk) 03:33, 4 June 2013 (UTC)Reply



2. Fußball-BundesligaBundesliga 2 or 2nd Bundesliga or Bundesliga (second division) – Now that Fußball-Bundesliga has been moved to 'Bundesliga' upon recognition that the title was neither in English nor was the common name, the time is ripe to do the same for the same rationale.  Ohc ¡digame!¿que pasa? 09:27, 17 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Survey

edit
Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.

Discussion

edit
Any additional comments:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.