 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Additional information request edit
1xbet is a rogue bookmaker. Information available is scarce. If you have any further details please feel free to collaborate. Wukiki (talk) 01:20, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
Contested deletion edit
This page was created based on articles and information published by the media and reporters. Everything is referenced. Wukiki (talk) 22:51, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion edit
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 13:39, 5 July 2021 (UTC)
1xbet Bankrupt? edit
My work is done here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wukiki (talk • contribs) 01:10, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 1 May 2022 edit
 | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The brazilian team is MIBR, not MIRB. Guess it's a type. 2804:14C:1AE:2881:30DC:9414:2A3F:283E (talk) 13:12, 1 May 2022 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 14 July 2022 edit
| | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Under sponsor, we can add 1xbet was a sponsor for IPL 2022 in India Bonuscodeindia (talk) 14:21, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 14:29, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
Possible NPOV? edit
Hello, after taking a brief look at this page it looks like it may have an NPOV issue. Although I am sure the company has its controversies, to split them into three sections - and have them as the predominant sections/only sections with in-depth information on the page - makes the article read like it was written by someone with a vendetta against the company. From what I can see in the page history, attempts have been made to add content that then gets removed. I can see these users have been blocked for being sock puppet accounts, so that might explain it. However, I still feel as though the article should be changed substantially to meet NPOV guidelines and add some neutrality to the page.Melancholyhelper (talk) 14:54, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Attack page deletion edit
This article along with the secondary article 22bet - combined with comments on the talk page from the editor and page creator Wukiki - would indicate this and the 22bet articles are both attack pages.Technoarg (talk) 16:51, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
Lead section edit
Hello, after looking at the most recent version of the lead section it's clear that information from other sections has either been moved up into the lead section or copy and pasted word for word meaning the same paragraph appears twice in the article. As well as this there are some factual inaccuracies in some of the sections according to the sources/citations used and I will be addressing these also. I will be reverting the lead section to the previous version and making updates to sections with factual inaccuracies soon. If anyone has any opinions please let me know here. Danwordy (talk) 15:26, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
817842583 37.111.242.72 (talk) 17:40, 24 April 2024 (UTC)