Talk:1989 World Snooker Championship/GA1

Latest comment: 3 years ago by Lee Vilenski in topic GA Review

GA Review edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Lee Vilenski (talk · contribs) 15:21, 23 March 2021 (UTC)Reply


Hello, I am planning on reviewing this article for GA Status, over the next couple of days. Thank you for nominating the article for GA status. I hope I will learn some new information, and that my feedback is helpful.

If nominators or editors could refrain from updating the particular section that I am updating until it is complete, I would appreciate it to remove a edit conflict. Please address concerns in the section that has been completed above (If I've raised concerns up to references, feel free to comment on things like the lede.)

I generally provide an overview of things I read through the article on a first glance. Then do a thorough sweep of the article after the feedback is addressed. After this, I will present the pass/failure. I may use strikethrough tags when concerns are met. Even if something is obvious why my concern is met, please leave a message as courtesy.

Best of luck! you can also use the {{done}} tag to state when something is addressed. Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs)

Please let me know after the review is done, if you were happy with the review! Obviously this is regarding the article's quality, however, I want to be happy and civil to all, so let me know if I have done a good job, regardless of the article's outcome.

Links edit

Prose edit

Lede edit

  • ranking professional snooker tournament - not a big fan of this wording, I think you can omit ranking here, and link it when you mention it later. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 15:24, 23 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

General edit

  • I think the overview/format should really have some sort of mention of the sessions, and how they work. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 15:36, 23 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • Qualifying could do with being split up a bit better in terms of paragraphs. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 15:36, 23 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • I added a few details. The split is now between the last qualifying round, and earlier rounds. BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 19:15, 23 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • Is it worth mentioning what rank Alex Higgins was, as we commented that he won an event shortly before this. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 15:36, 23 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • eventually knocked out 4–13 - defeated. Knocked out is something that happens in boxing. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 15:36, 23 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • Could we move the Parrott image to the semi-finals (where he won), and then put in a Steve Davis one for the final? Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 15:36, 23 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • IIRC, didn't Parrott have to do some sort of exhibition as the match finished early? Certainly worth a mention if sources say about it. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 15:36, 23 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • whilst 1989 proved to be the last world final reached by Davis - just say this was the last final for Davis. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 15:36, 23 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Review meta comments edit

  • Thanks for your constructive review, Lee Vilenski - I've replied to all the points above. Let me know about anything else that is needed. Regards, BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 20:12, 23 March 2021 (UTC)Reply