Talk:1988–89 in English football

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

source of the text? edit

I did some wikification on this page, but it reads like it was copied from somewhere else. It could probably use some cleaning up too. Bigdottawa 23:59, 12 February 2006 (UTC)Reply

This is wrong edit

"Change in playoff format

The play-off system was slightly altered - the fourth-bottom team in the First Division would no longer be relegated if they lost in the play-offs, as too many teams staying up could have played havoc with the number of teams in the First and Second Divisions."

How would it have played havoc with the number of teams there? Either one went down and one went up or nobody moved.

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 1988–89 in English football. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:01, 15 September 2016 (UTC)Reply