Talk:1987 Italian referendums

Learn more about this page

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Italy Low‑importance

	Italy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Italy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Italy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ItalyWikipedia:WikiProject ItalyTemplate:WikiProject ItalyItaly articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Elections and Referendums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles

Energy Low‑importance

	Energy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Untitled edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Reading the original questions, or the very good transalted ones here, it is clear that the referendum did ask for "reject expansion of the country's nuclear power industry".

That was a political decision, as written later, where the referendum was taken as "justification". I would change the first sentence.

Mario Alemi de Mennato (talk) 13:14, 3 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Also, I dont think that has to do with nuclear physics. That's politics.... any comment?

Mario Alemi de Mennato (talk) 13:14, 3 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

I agree on your first point (assuming you meant "the referendum did not ask..."), and have rephrased the article accordingly. As to the second point, do you refer to the classifications of the article as a stub? Even if it refers to a political event, it might be of interest to people interested in nuclear physics, probably. Happy editing, Goochelaar (talk) 19:51, 3 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Add topic