Talk:1985 Tour de France

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 1985 Tour de France. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130209134934/http://www.roadcycling.co.nz/TourdeFrance/tour-de-france-demystified-part-1.html to http://www.roadcycling.co.nz/TourdeFrance/tour-de-france-demystified-part-1.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:46, 15 June 2017 (UTC)

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:1985 Tour de France/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: MonkeyStolen234 (talk · contribs) 15:42, 17 May 2020 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Some comments

@Zwerg Nase: hi! I saw this just passed GA, but I read it and saw some things I think could be improved: the lead still looks quite short compared to the article length, and would be even shorter if the infobox weren't so wide, so I feel it might need another paragraph. Also, the bullet point about Le Mond's shirt below the final standings table seems out of place. Could it be expanded to give some context? I also think it would serve better as an explanatory footnote within the table. Best, Kingsif (talk) 03:07, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

@Kingsif: Hey! I was also rather surprised at the quick pass... I will turn towards the lead and expand it before I enter the article for FA. As for the note on LeMond, that is the convention in the WikiProject, so if that were to change, it would need to be done for all Tour de France articles... Zwerg Nase (talk) 09:18, 18 May 2020 (UTC)