Talk:1982 World Snooker Championship/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Tayi Arajakate (talk · contribs) 14:37, 17 October 2020 (UTC)

Meta-discussion

• Hello Lee Vilenski and BennyOnTheLoose, I'll be the one to review this nomination. Will be post further comments within the next few days. Tayi Arajakate _Talk 14:37, 17 October 2020 (UTC)

  Lee Vilenski and BennyOnTheLoose, pinging, as I have completed the review and it appears to be meet the criteria of good article on nomination. One minor issue was spotted which is listed in the comments below. Tayi Arajakate _Talk 15:07, 24 October 2020 (UTC)

Assessment

1. Comprehension: The comprehension of the article is good.
Pass

Criteria	Notes	Result
(a) (prose)	The prose is well writen.	Pass
(b) (MoS)	The article is complaint with the manual of style	Pass

2. Verifiability: The article is verifiable.
Pass

Criteria	Notes	Result
(a) (references)	References are provided and in compliance with the manual of style.	Pass
(b) (citations to reliable sources)	Citations are from reliable sources.	Pass
(c) (original research)	No original research was found.	Pass
(d) (copyvio and plagiarism)	No copyright issues were found.	Pass

3. Comprehensiveness: The article is broad and focus in its coverage.
Pass

Criteria	Notes	Result
(a) (major aspects)	The article's coverage is appropriately broad.	Pass
(b) (focused)	The article is focused and without any unnecessary deviations.	Pass

4. Neutrality: The article is complaint with the policy on neutral point of view.
Pass

Notes	Result
No editorial bias or neutrality issues were observed	Pass

5. Stability: The article is stable.
Pass

Notes	Result
No edit warring or content disputes.	Pass

6. Illustration: The article is well illustrated with appropriate images and other graphical features.
Pass

Criteria	Notes	Result
(a) (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales)	Images are tagged with their appropriate copyright statuses.	Pass
(b) (appropriate use with suitable captions)	Use of images is appropriate with suitable captions present.	Pass

Current status: Pass

Comments

• One minor issue was spotted, the main draw and qualifying use different abbreviations for South Africa. Looking at other articles on World Snooker Championship, the abbreviation of RSA seems to be the appropriate one. Tayi Arajakate _Talk 15:04, 24 October 2020 (UTC)

• Thanks, Tayi Arajakate. I've changed the "SAF" abbreviations to "RSA" as suggested. Regards, BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 21:38, 24 October 2020 (UTC)