Talk:1977 NBA draft

Latest comment: 1 month ago by Launchballer in topic Did you know nomination

Untitled

edit

Lucia Harris was drafted. The first women drafted by the NBA, she should be include in other notable picks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.113.145.187 (talk) 04:44, 19 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

Correction

edit

The 1977 NBA Draft wasn't televised on ESPN, ESPN was born in 1979. (User Class="autosigned" Its Joeysworld) 09:00, 12 October 2020 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 35.136.5.50 (talk)

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 1977 NBA draft. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:46, 14 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on 1977 NBA draft. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:51, 15 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Did you know nomination

edit
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected by reviewer, closed by Launchballer talk 13:14, 1 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

  • Reviewed:
Created by CavsFan45 (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.

CavsFan45 (talk) 16:15, 31 May 2024 (UTC).Reply

  • Shouldn't "Scooby-Doo" link to Scooby-Doo (character)? Cremastra (talk) 22:38, 31 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  •   Sorry, but it's not eligible. First, the hook fact is not mentioned in the article. That's easily fixed, but more importantly, in the last week, the article has not had a five-times expansion (the last edit was April 17) or been designated a WP:GA. The article is currently over 5000 prose characters, so an expansion isn't feasible, but you could get it promoted to Good Article and then renominate. (The article was already a DYK in 2010, but a recent rule change allows another appearance after five years.) Please see WP:DYK for general information. MANdARAX • XAЯAbИAM 23:08, 31 May 2024 (UTC)Reply