Talk:1975–76 Buffalo Braves season

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified
Good article1975–76 Buffalo Braves season has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
July 16, 2010Good article nomineeNot listed
October 21, 2010Good article nomineeListed
Current status: Good article

Image copyright problem with File:Buffalobraves.jpg edit

The image File:Buffalobraves.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
  • That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --07:35, 3 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

GA Review edit

This review is transcluded from Talk:1975–76 Buffalo Braves season/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Wizardman Operation Big Bear 19:31, 16 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

My concerns with the length and lack of detail, as I had with the other Buffalo articles, apply here, and as such I'm failing it. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 19:31, 16 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

GA Review edit

This review is transcluded from Talk:1975–76 Buffalo Braves season/GA2. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Wizardman Operation Big Bear 05:05, 17 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

I'll review this over the next couple days. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 05:05, 17 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Couple = five I guess. Anyway, here's the review:

  • "The series went the full three games but the Braves found themselves on the road for Game 3." since when were there three-game playoff series? Or maybe this was a temporary change in the rules for that season. If so then this can be omitted.
  • "The season culminated with Ramsay not being rehired." Noted in the previous paragraph, so redundant.
  • "After 4 games, the series was even at 2 wins each. Once again the Celtics would take the series in 6 games." Write out #s.
  • Not much in the march-april section basketball-wise. Anything else of note? I presume not else it would already be in there.
  • Is the notes column in the schedule necessary, since it's not being used?
  • The playoff schedule is a bit messed up; the OT mark is creating an extra column.

A better article, not as many issues. Article on hold, will pass when fixed. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 22:09, 21 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Everything checks out. Yeah, I'm pretty young, this is all before my time. GA passed. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 23:43, 21 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on 1975–76 Buffalo Braves season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:39, 9 June 2017 (UTC)Reply