This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
This article is written in Canadian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, centre, travelled, realize, analyze) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I am not against Wikipedia mentioning bad things about certain leaders as it is important to know all of the facts and points of view about a person. This article, however, only talks about one of the issues during the election that made Duplessis seem like a bigot even though there were much bigger issues at the time (such as provincial autonomy and the nationalization of electricity) that didn't even get mentioned. I won't delete anything even though what has already been written was obviously written from an anti-Duplessis standpoint, but I will add some information about provincial autonomy and the nationalization of electricity. CrypticIndividual1000 (talk) 22:13, 21 March 2019 (UTC)Reply
