Talk:1941 Florida hurricane/GA1
Latest comment: 15 years ago by Juliancolton in topic GA Review
GA Review edit
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Hi! I'll be reviewing this article for GA status, and should have the full review up soon. Dana boomer (talk) 00:07, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose):
b (MoS):
- a (prose):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (references):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars etc.:
- No edit wars etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- A very nice article, and one that I am going to pass to GA status, since I can't find anything wrong with it :) Let me know if you have any questions. Dana boomer (talk) 01:32, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks. :) –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 05:25, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
- A very nice article, and one that I am going to pass to GA status, since I can't find anything wrong with it :) Let me know if you have any questions. Dana boomer (talk) 01:32, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
- Pass/Fail:
