Talk:1927 Liberian general election

Untitled

Did King 'win' 243,000, or 24,000? There seems to be a lot of evidence that 24,000 was in fact the correct figure. -143.234.1.111 (talk) 12:24, 15 June 2017 (UTC)

Actually scratch that, 243,000 seems the correct figure. https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=cTwXDAAAQBAJ&pg=PT50&lpg=PT50&dq=liberia+elections+1931&source=bl&ots=VBPfGX6ijU&sig=EMf07RnqpO0DgRIOP2VgQ6zQ3Vw&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwi_zoWo6r_UAhUDPBoKHVSgDRsQ6AEIVTAI#v=onepage&q=liberia%20elections%201931&f=false -143.234.1.111 (talk) 12:33, 15 June 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Liberian general election, 1927. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110716041012/http://www.senegambianews.com/article/Education/Education/Academic_Report_on_The_Grassroots_of_Conflict_in_Liberia/2151 to http://www.senegambianews.com/article/Education/Education/Academic_Report_on_The_Grassroots_of_Conflict_in_Liberia/2151

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:41, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

Number of votes

According to the Brooklyn Daily Eagle on 10 May 1927:

Charles D. B. King has just been elected President for the time, beating T. R. Faulkner, a former American negro, by 60,000.

The currently represented margin of 231,000 (171,000 off from the contemporary number) comes from the commission head "recalling" them in 2004, 77 years after the fact. In a book compiling works by the journalist George Schuyler, the number mentioned is 243,000. Is there any more direct source for the number of votes King is supposed to have received?

References

IceWelder [✉] 11:10, 25 September 2023 (UTC)

Per Charles S. Johnson's Bitter Canaan pp. 149-150 (written 1930, revised 1948, published 1987):

The election officers printed 250,000 ballots, over forty times the number of voters and more than enough for the entire hinterland population, and these were distributed on the streets in large bundles...The returns showed 9,000 votes for Faulkner and 235,000 for King. In Bassa Country, for example, where there were not more than 3,000 legal voters, 32,000 names were registered and 72,000 voted. The case was protested in court...When the legislature was compelled to get the ballot boxes from the State Department for a recount, they found stacks of ballots unfolded and even uncut. They ordered them burned at once. The president entered his third term, and the commissioner of elections was sent to prison for the illegal registering of voters. No satisfactory explanation was ever made of the figures.

I guess I probably wouldn't put much stock in whatever wire was sent to the Eagle; it was also clearly fabricated, but not considered official. Perhaps court records have survived in some form? That may be the likeliest place to find whatever the official tally was. Star Garnet (talk) 15:37, 25 September 2023 (UTC)

I have also seen some sources stating King received 24,000 votes (not 240,000), but figures around 240,000 (particularly 243,000) seem to be the most common. Interestingly Joseph Saye Guannu's A Short History of the First Liberian Republic gives some actual figures – 229,527 for King and 8,992 for Faulkner (p45), but these do not seem to be repeated in any other publication available online from what I can see. Number 57 19:08, 26 September 2023 (UTC)

Actually, I've found some more sources with those exact figures, including this journal. Number 57 20:33, 26 September 2023 (UTC)

Good stuff. I wanted to look these numbers up on Newspapers.com but the Wikipedia Library proxy seems down right now. When I was still looking into this a few days ago, I found this 1929 article that first mentions that "250,000, more or less" votes were officially cast. This was then expanded on in 1931:

Although only property owners enjoy the right of franchise in Liberia and not over 15,000 persons were qualified as electors, King received 243,000 votes while Faulker got but 9000! King's aide-de-camp alone delivered 100,000 votes from the interior.

I do wonder why sources oscillate between 243,000, 240,000, 235,000, and 229,527 votes for King, as well as the original 60,000 margin. How should we handle this? Use the most accuracte number and state the rest in an efn-note? IceWelder [✉] 16:55, 27 September 2023 (UTC)

Unfortunately it's all too common that sources give significantly difference results for elections... However, I would imagine a source that has exact numbers may be more likely to be reliable than heavily rounded ones? Cheers, Number 57 21:10, 27 September 2023 (UTC)