Talk:1926 Copa del Rey

	Association football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Spanish football task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the season article task force.

Spain Low‑importance

	Spain portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spain, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Spain on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpainWikipedia:WikiProject SpainTemplate:WikiProject SpainSpain articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Edit request on 24 August 2013

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

‹ The template Edit semi-protected is being considered for merging. ›

Second leg: April 26, 1926 Athletic Madrid 2–0 RCD Espanyol Real Sociedad 2–2 Celta Vigo agg:3 - 4 FC Barcelona 23-1 Real Madrid agg: 113 - 1 Deportivo la Coruna 4–4 Real Union de Irun agg:3 - 7

the 15 - 1 is a wrong result

Muhammad koxi (talk) 01:34, 24 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Not done: please make your request in a "change X to Y" format. Jackmcbarn (talk) 00:25, 25 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Vandalism

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

There has been lots of vandalism on this page. I recently visited the page and found that some vandalism still exists, so after some research, I restored it to this version. I consider myself relatively new to Wikipedia so I would like to know if this decision was correct. Please drop a message at my Talk Page if my edits were wrong. Thanks. Bryan (talk) 21:12, 24 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Qualified via a tie-break match

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

‹ The template Edit fully-protected is being considered for merging. ›

In the 'Notes' section it is written that Athletic Madrid and Celta Vigo "qualified on a tie-break match". This does not sound right. Should be "qualified VIA a tie-break match". ^Ol^Ja 23:06, 28 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Done — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 08:00, 30 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Protection

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

@Discospinster: looking at the history, it seems that semi-protection is adequate for this article. Are you okay with that? — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 08:01, 30 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

OK. ... discospinster _talk 15:19, 30 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Semi-protected edit request on 22 December 2017

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

‹ The template Edit semi-protected is being considered for merging. ›

{{subst:trim|1=

Not done. Your request is blank and not formatted correctly. CityOfSilver 19:25, 22 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic