Talk:1896 Michigan Wolverines football team/GA1
Latest comment: 13 years ago by Grondemar in topic GA Review
GA Review edit
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: –Grondemar 23:10, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
Working I will complete and post this review within the next few days. –Grondemar 23:10, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
This was a surprisingly-challenging article to review, since many of the conventions used in modern college football season GAs don't apply or there is not enough information available. Below are my comments:
- I moved the Preseason developments section above the Schedule section to better match other college football GAs such as 2008 Maryland Terrapins football team and 1997 Michigan Wolverines football team.
- It would be nice if quarter-by-quarter line scores, attendances, and other information was added for each game, but I understand if that kind of information is not available.
- It might be better, and more standard, to name the individual game subsections after the opponents, perhaps with either a "vs" or "at", rather than the full score.
- I lowered the header level of Indoor football, so it would appear under the Chicago game rather than in its own independent section, since it is really a subpart of the Chicago game.
- Did Chicago really play 18 games in the 1896 season? Is that season summary box right?
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- I am placing this nomination on hold to allow the above issues to be addressed. I do not anticipate that addressing them will be challenging.
- Pass/Fail: