Talk:1896 Cedar Keys hurricane

Latest comment: 3 years ago by Jarodalien in topic Just to make sure...
Featured article1896 Cedar Keys hurricane is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Good topic star1896 Cedar Keys hurricane is part of the 1896 Atlantic hurricane season series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on March 20, 2019.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
February 23, 2017Good article nomineeListed
March 10, 2017Featured article candidatePromoted
May 14, 2017Good topic candidatePromoted
Current status: Featured article

GA Review edit

This review is transcluded from Talk:1896 Cedar Keys hurricane/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: TropicalAnalystwx13 (talk · contribs) 06:46, 23 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

  • "The 1896 Cedar Keys hurricane was a powerful and destructive tropical cyclone that devastated much of the East Coast of the United States, starting with Florida's Cedar Keys, near the end of September 1896." - Is the fact it started with the Cedar Keys really necessary? I mean, it's notable in that Florida's Cedar Keys were most devastated, but I don't think it's that important they were affected first.
  • Perhaps more importantly, is it really harmful? I like to place the article's title in context as early on as possible, and this time I thought the opening line worked quite well for that purpose. Almost every source discussing the hurricane starts off with its impact in the Cedar Keys, and since this article discusses impacts outside of Florida more comprehensively than perhaps any other publication, I want to make sure it doesn't lose sight of its Cedar Keys notoriety. – Juliancolton | Talk 14:13, 23 February 2017 (UTC)Reply
  • You reference the storm as "it" in three consecutive sentences after the one above. Switch it up a bit!
  • "The storm killed at least 70 people in mainland Florida, while inflicting approximately $3 million in property damage across the state." * Tag a note on that bad boy saying 1896 USD unless otherwise stated.
  • I really don't feel like starting a whole notes section for one six-word definition. I was hoping the (1896) in the infobox would be enough to establish that. Any other way it can be done? – Juliancolton | Talk 14:13, 23 February 2017 (UTC)Reply
  • "The system weakened as it sped northward through the Carolinas, but when it reached the Mid-Atlantic states on the evening of September 29, its increasingly rapid forward movement contributed to renewed wind violence" - Wind violence sounds unnecessarily...flashy? Why not just say renewed intensity?
  • The rest of the article discusses "intensity" in terms of best track strength, and since the storm's official intensity didn't actually increase, I think that would be OR. Besides, there's nothing wrong with a little showmanship once in a while. ;) – Juliancolton | Talk 14:13, 23 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

I'll tackle Impact and aftermath tomorrow. TropicalAnalystwx13 (talk · contributions) 06:46, 23 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for taking on the review. Looking forward to the rest of your suggestions! – Juliancolton | Talk 14:13, 23 February 2017 (UTC)Reply
  • "In Newberry, which was "totally wrecked"," - Comma goes inside the quotations always, I already told you this. Don't make me repeat it.
  • "including Forsyth Park, considered the "pride of the city"," - You're making me repeat it.
  • "In Burroughs, along the outskirts of Savannah, two churches were leveled and three people killed." - Missing a word.
  • "Around Beaufort, the storm wrecked numerous boats and did significant damage to homes and businesses." - Can we use something better than "and did"?
  • "All telegraph lines except one, which ran to Wilmington, North Carolina, were rendered useless, while communications Petersburg were entirely cut off." - Missin' a word.
  • "The destruction continued into northern portions of the state; brick walls were toppled and about 500 shade trees felled in Fredericksburg." - Parallelism needed; 500 shade trees were felled.
  • "Along the way, the torrent swept away 25 homes, one of which was occupied by a family of four." - Ok? Are you saying the houses were vacant except that one in particular? Otherwise, I don't see the need to point that out.
  • Well, those four people died. Any suggestions on how to clarify that? – Juliancolton | Talk 22:08, 23 February 2017 (UTC)Reply
  • "Five-minute sustained southerly winds reached 66 mph (106 km/h),[7] and peak gusts approached 100 mph (160 km/h); pressure fell to 987 hPa (29.15 inHg)." - "pressure" → "the barometric pressure"
  • "Property damage was especially severe in southeastern parts of the state, especially York and Lancaster counties, where barns were demolished and houses unroofed." - Parallelism needed.
  • I think that's an acceptable sentence structure (same with several of the above comments). – Juliancolton | Talk 22:08, 23 February 2017 (UTC)Reply
  • "In Reading, two men died in the collapse of an iron furnace casting house which left five others were badly injured." -were

That's about all I can nitpick. Nice work. TropicalAnalystwx13 (talk · contributions) 20:38, 23 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 1896 Cedar Keys hurricane. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:16, 19 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Great Lakes region edit

Are there any reports on the hurricane's damage and effects from the Canadian side of the Great Lakes region? 2607:FEA8:1DE0:7B4:B8BC:FEC:D2DE:8EA3 (talk) 06:30, 20 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

Just to make sure... edit

Hi User:Juliancolton, I'm translating this article to Chinese, just want to make sure they're all right:

  • fn 15, is this the right url? clip 8734911
  • ref name fraser178188, but actually page 187–188?
  • ref name oickle89, but actually page 79?

--Jarodalien (talk) 16:29, 9 May 2020 (UTC)Reply