This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
Latest comment: 6 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Want to briefly explain rationale for two decisions. The writing is fairly detailed, covering various specific landmarks visited. The details are not truly exhaustive; there's a lot I excluded. Some of these details are little-known, and I just found them interesting (creating Wikipedia rabbitholes to go down) and hope others do too. Second, the quote at the very end is pretty sharp, but it is an opinion by a scholar whose work otherwise seems to be good. The author of the quote is Joo Dong Wan, a lecturer at Hankuk University of Foreign Studies. I've browsed some of his other writings and they're all quality without significant POV. toobigtokale (talk) 06:17, 28 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
B. Reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):
Spot check of sources 1: I've looked at the four instances of citation 75. The second and third use of this citation are spot on. The first and fourth usages have incorrect page numbers (should be p.109 and p.111 respectively), although the source does verify the claims. Godtres (talk) 10:50, 11 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
Spot check of sources 2: I've looked at the two instances of citation 5. This supports both claims (with correct page references). Godtres (talk) 10:50, 11 February 2024 (UTC)Reply