Talk:1881

Years Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Years, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Years on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.YearsWikipedia:WikiProject YearsTemplate:WikiProject YearsYears articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Lists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

[Untitled] edit

Latest comment: 20 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The year in topic layout on this page is one of three versions. I seek opinions before making them all the same; see comment on my talk page

1881 is currently conforming to proposed general model. unlike 1882, 1883

--BozMo 13:44, 5 May 2004 (UTC)(talk)Reply

Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The following event is not supported by any references or any other entries within wikipedia Nigosh 05:01, 29 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

could a native speaker bring that into the article, please ? --Neun-x (talk) 21:39, 1 January 2016 (UTC)Reply