 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
Why is this here? edit
...and are 14969 Kubacek and 14970 also main belt asteroids with orbital period of some overexact lengths? How many main belt asteroids are there, and are they all going to have their own articles? Thousands of articles with all saying "23838472 Snoodleboot is a main belt asteroid with an orbital period of 2400.3897986523786584783 days"? Where is the "notability" here? An article about my brother Dave would be of interest to at least some people, but would be deleted as too obscure. What could possibly be more obscure that one more cold dumb rock in the vast unfeeling nothingness of space?
Unless someone can point to anything at all of interest about this speck of nothing, I will nominate it for deletion.Chrisrus (talk) 04:58, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
Rewrite edit
After the article was redirected in 2015, it has now been rewritten and rated "Low" for both Astronomy and Solar System wiki projects. it has not yet been rated on the quality scale. Rfassbind – talk 10:20, 6 April 2016 (UTC)