Talk:10 euro note

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:10 euro note/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Vibhijain (talk · contribs) 15:57, 19 October 2011 (UTC)

Will review it in some days.

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
	1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.	As per [1], many statements have been directly copied from reference no.5. Please change them and try not to copy more than 3 consecutive words from sources (common sense exceptions apply).
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.	The introductory line should say "The ten euro (€10) note is the second lowest value of the euro banknotes after the 5 euro note and has been used since the introduction of the euro (in its cash form) in 2002". Done Also the line "All bank notes depict bridges and arches/doorways in a different historical European style: in the lead is not required. Just say that the architectural style depicted in the 10 euro note is Romanesque architecture. Done Also the section named "References" needs to be changed to "Notes" since there is a footnote and 2 footnotes in the 10th reference.  Done Kindly put the references after the punctuation marks, for example, it should be "(between the 11th and 12th centuries CE).[2]" instead of "(between the 11th and 12th centuries CE). [2]".  Done Also the "History" section seems to describe the history of Euro, not 10 euro note, please fix that as soon as possible. Done
	2. Verifiable with no original research:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.	The reference provided for "Security Features:" section of the infobox doesn't seems to support the content.  Done
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).
	2c. it contains no original research.
	3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.	The same article on other versions of Wikipedia addresses some other details also, please find verifiable information from them and put it in this article. (Google Translate can be helpful, however it is strongly adviced that you don't copy the original translation as it might has numerous grammatical errors.)  Done Security features need more description, a little like what is done on et:10-eurone rahatäht. Done
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.	Change "100% pure cotton fibre" to "Cotton fibre"  Done
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
	6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.	File:10 euro infrarot aufnahme.JPG is not properly tagged for copyright.  Done
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.	WP:ALT is not present in many of the images, please add them and kindly cleanup the caption for File:10 euro infrarot aufnahme.JPG, somewhat like, "Comparison of a note under infrared light (left), and a note under normal light (right)."  Done
	7. Overall assessment.	Article passed, thanks for the hard work.

Comments

I am leaving some dupicate detector comments:

1. DONE.
2. DONE.
3. Cannot be changed.
4. Cannot be changed.
5. DONE.
6. Cannot be changed.
7. Cannot be changed.

Viewing this, I am putting a palm to my face. (FACEPALM).

1. Cannot be changed.
2. "

I'll finish the improving later on.– Plarem ^{(User talk contribs)} 19:41, 19 October 2011 (UTC)

(Translated text from es:Billete de diez euros)

Follow-up

There are several communities of people at European level (most of which is EuroBillTracker ) that, as a hobby, it keeps track of the euro banknotes that pass through their hands, to keep track and know where they travel or have traveled. The aim is to record as many notes as possible in order to know details about its spread (from where and to where they travel in general), follow it up (where a ticket has been seen in particular) and generate statistics and rankings (for example, in which countries there are more tickets). EuroBillTracker currently are registered more than 75 million tickets, worth more than 1600 million euros.

1. No references.

Am I supposed to use this? – Plarem ^{(User talk contribs)} 18:52, 21 October 2011 (UTC)

Now, I have never seen such a good GA Reviewer. Your English grammar isn't perfect, but your reviewing skills are great! – Plarem ^{(User talk contribs)} 19:03, 21 October 2011 (UTC)

If the the content is not reliable, do not add it, btw thanks for your comments, I know my English grammar isn't perfect, but I am trying to fix that. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ ^{Talk Email} 11:01, 22 October 2011 (UTC)

Since references are there now, you can keep it. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ ^{Talk Email} 12:47, 22 October 2011 (UTC)

Maybe there is some misunderstanding, i meant to change the "Security Features:" section, not the "Paper Type:".  Done ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ ^{Talk Email} 10:11, 23 October 2011 (UTC)

GA Reassessment

This discussion is transcluded from Talk:10 euro note/GA2. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   "The changeover period during which the former currencies' notes and coins were exchanged for those of the euro lasted about two months, until 28 February 2002." should include the start date which was 1 January 2002  Done

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   Reference #9 is a dead link. Has been dead since 2012-07-01.  Done

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Comment

 Done – Plarem ^{(User talk)} 12:30, 23 August 2012 (UTC)

New (2014) 10 euro note designer information

The information about the designer of the second series is probably incorrect. I am still trying to verify that the second note in the Europa series was also designed by Reinhold Gerstetter instead of Robert Kalina, but I have not yet been able to find a source for this information. Please help update this information. George horvath83 (talk) 08:53, 20 January 2014 (UTC)

Hi I'm Petros bafana tsotetsi cn I ask about Euro 10 Rand plz 105.245.105.103 (talk) 12:35, 21 November 2023 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on 10 euro note. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110607234444/http://www.unmikonline.org/regulations/admdirect/1999/089%20Final%20%20ADE%201999-02.htm to http://www.unmikonline.org/regulations/admdirect/1999/089%20Final%20%20ADE%201999-02.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130911232930/http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/focuson/focuson9120_en.htm to http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/focuson/focuson9120_en.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070926234241/http://www.dnb.nl/dnb/home?lang=en&id=tcm%3A47-150696-64 to http://www.dnb.nl/dnb/home?lang=en&id=tcm%3A47-150696-64
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://en.eurobilltracker.com/about/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:20, 5 June 2017 (UTC)