Talk:.uk/GA1

Latest comment: 12 years ago by Arsenikk in topic GA Review

GA Review edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Arsenikk (talk · contribs) 09:14, 11 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

This article is no-where near meeting the good article criteria. The prose needs to be clean up, such as not including in-line external links, and not making three-word paragraphs. The list of second-level domains should be converted to a sortable table. The most problematic issue is that the article is virtually unreferenced, and where references are included, they constitute just bare URLs instead of properly-formatted references. I am therefore quick-failing the article for failing criteria 2. I also note that the nominator has not participated in editing the article and that drive-by nominations are strongly discouraged. It is considered impolite to nominate an article without consulting the other main contributors unless you have written the bulk of the article yourself. Arsenikk (talk) 09:14, 11 February 2012 (UTC)Reply