Talk:.hack//AI buster

Latest comment: 17 years ago by BetacommandBot in topic Fair use rationale for Image:HackAIBuster.JPG

Novel?

edit

Is this a novel, manga, graphic novel, or book? Or something else? Grey Shadow 09:02, 19 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

It's a novel. ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 01:11, 30 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Not a classic text novel - so it is not part of the novel project. :: Kevinalewis : (Talk Page)/(Desk) 12:35, 28 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Plot summary

edit

Can someone look over this? It was ignored when the CPVIO was removed. --Raijinili 23:09, 9 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

Well, yeah, it's too much plot to be a simple summary, but at least I tried. --Raijinili 23:10, 9 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

I don't see what's wrong with it, assuming it doesn't violate any copyrights. If you don't mind, I'll implement it and try to summarize it more succintly. --Skoban 23:41, 3 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

I like it, and I like that you left them as two distinct characters until the end. Even the Tokyopop site spoiled that little bit in their very short description. --Raijinili 17:41, 4 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

"W.B. Yates"/"W.B. Yeates" or "W.B. Yeats"

edit

But you don't have a valid source for "W.B. Yates" either as Tokyopop has used both "W.B. Yates" and "W.B Yeates" (this one is also incorrect) in the two novels (look in your own books for reference). So, if Tokyopop can not decide which spelling is the correct one between those two, how can you??

Furthermore, we know that Haruka loves irish and celtic poetry, and W.B. Yeats is a real irish poet, so is not to crazy to assume she named her character after him. I ask you, between choosing arbitrary one of those alternate spelling by Tokyopop, or going for the name of the real poet (which match her liking), which one is more subjective?

Of course, you could said that Haruka choose a different spelling even if she named her character after W.B. Yeats, but again, in this case, how are you going to decide which alternate spelling by Tokyopop to use? "W.B. Yates", or "W.B. Yeates"?

As you see, in this case Tokyopop is invalidad as a source, and I don't have a source either, so, what are we going to do? Personally, I would go for the real poet, as Tokyopop's indecisiveness can not be trusted. Kazu-kun 16:03, 22 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

I would go with what this book says for this book's article, and leave the note saying that it may have been intentional OR an error. This would conform with WP:NPOV and WP:RS, I think. --Raijinili 16:20, 22 January 2007 (UTC)Reply
You don't understand, the book says BOTH alternate spellings "W.B. Yates" and "W.B Yeates", which one are you going to use?? and based on what?. Kazu-kun 16:58, 22 January 2007 (UTC)Reply
How many times is each one used? --Raijinili 04:09, 27 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

did anyone else notice the items eciov.cyl, rae.cyl, eye.cyl, yromem.cyl, etaf.cyl all spell some thing backwards?? and the extension .cyl is the first part of the ai's name, also backwards? should this go in the trivia section?


BlueFoxx

Fair use rationale for Image:HackAIBuster.JPG

edit
 

Image:HackAIBuster.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:18, 5 June 2007 (UTC)Reply