Talk:...Meanwhile

Latest comment: 13 years ago by JeffGBot in topic Dead link

References

edit

This article is coming along nicely, and I'd like to see it eventually reaching GA standard, but the references aren't done quite right yet. I've added a section which will automatically display footnotes once they are properly entered in-line with the text. There are some really good instruction here for how to create footnotes automatically. Let me know if there's anything I can help you with. Alex valavanis 00:53, 20 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:10cc meanwhile.jpg

edit
 

Image:10cc meanwhile.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 19:15, 13 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

edit

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 04:38, 31 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Assessment comment

edit

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:...Meanwhile/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Comment(s)Press [show] to view →
Start class:
  •  Y A reasonably complete infobox
  •  Y A lead section giving an overview of the album
  •  Y A track listing
  •  Y Reference to at least primary personnel by name (must specify performers on the current album; a band navbox is insufficient)
  •  Y Categorisation at least by artist and year

C class:

  •  Y All the start class criteria
  •  Y A reasonably complete infobox, including cover art
  •  N At least one section of prose (in addition to the lead section)
  •  Y A track listing containing track lengths and authors for all songs
  •  Y A "personnel" section listing performers, including guest musicians.

B class:

  •  N All the C class criteria
  •  Y A completed infobox, including cover art and most technical details
  •  N A full list of personnel, including technical personnel and guest musicians
  •  N No obvious issues with sourcing, including the use of blatantly improper sources.
  •  N No significant issues exist to hamper readability, although it may not rigorously follow WP:MOS
Article lacks individual sections for the prose, otherwise we have one big section. Lacks technical personnel and citations for some entire paragraphs. It get lowered down to a start class. Andrzejbanas (talk) 04:25, 6 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Substituted at 21:31, 26 June 2016 (UTC)